Screener
FDT vs FSGS
First Trust Developed Markets Ex-US AlphaDEX Fund vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- FSGS costs 0.19% less per year.
- FDT is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FDT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FDT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDT | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $29M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.98% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.2% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.8% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.38 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.14% | 15.30% |
| Max drawdown | -46.10% | -43.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDT and FSGS
Explore further