Screener
FDVV vs EFAS
Fidelity High Dividend ETF vs Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF
Key differences
- FDVV costs 0.40% less per year.
- FDVV is significantly larger than EFAS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDVV covers north america markets; EFAS covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, EFAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FDVV | EFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $48M |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.81% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.7% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.7% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.5% | +12.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.10% | 10.62% |
| Max drawdown | -40.25% | -44.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FDVV and EFAS
Explore further