Skip to content
Screener

FEBM vs FMAY

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May

FEBM

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$48M

FMAY

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$1.2B

Key differences

Both FEBM and FMAY are alternative ETFs. FEBM charges 0.85% a year and FMAY 0.85%. The main difference: FMAY is much larger than FEBM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • FMAY is much larger than FEBM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • FMAY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FEBMFMAY
Annual cost (TER)0.85%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$48M$1.2B
Since20252020
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+7.0%+12.1%
CAGR 3YN/A+13.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+9.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.02
Volatility 1Y2.18%6.30%
Max drawdown-2.60%-13.60%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FEBM and FMAY