Screener
FELC vs EPSV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FELC costs 0.70% less per year.
- FELC is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELC follows a active selection strategy; EPSV uses index tracking.
- FELC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELC | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.0B | $5M |
| Since | 2007 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.06% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -18.59% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FELC and EPSV
Explore further