Screener
FELV vs BLCV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF vs iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
Key differences
- FELV costs 0.28% less per year.
- FELV is significantly larger than BLCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELV follows a index tracking strategy; BLCV uses active selection.
- FELV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FELV | BLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $317M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.58% | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.81% | 11.64% |
| Max drawdown | -16.08% | -13.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FELV and BLCV
Explore further