Screener
FEMS vs FNX
First Trust Emerging Markets Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund vs First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FNX costs 0.18% less per year.
- FNX is significantly larger than FEMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FEMS covers emerging markets markets; FNX covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, FNX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FEMS | FNX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $264M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.22% | 0.84% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.3% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 16.17% |
| Max drawdown | -47.85% | -43.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FEMS and FNX
Explore further