Screener
FENI vs FFEM
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.32% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than FFEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FENI follows a active selection strategy; FFEM uses index tracking.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FENI | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.1B | $39M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.57% | 21.16% |
| Max drawdown | -14.20% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FENI and FFEM
Explore further