Screener
FENI vs OSEA
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.27% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than OSEA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FENI covers europe markets; OSEA covers global.
- FENI follows a active selection strategy; OSEA uses index tracking.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FENI | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.1B | $497M |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.93% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.57% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -14.20% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FENI and OSEA
Explore further