Screener
FESM vs FBND
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF vs Fidelity Total Bond ETF
Key differences
- FESM costs 0.08% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than FESM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FESM is classified as equity, while FBND is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- FESM covers north america markets; FBND covers global.
- FESM follows a index enhanced strategy; FBND uses index tracking.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FESM | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.0B | $25.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.9% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.05% | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -26.93% | -17.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FESM and FBND
Explore further