Screener
FESM vs IWB
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.13% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than FESM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FESM follows a index enhanced strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FESM | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.0B | $46.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.9% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.05% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -26.93% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FESM and IWB
Explore further