Screener
FESM vs MFSV
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Key differences
- FESM costs 0.16% less per year.
- FESM is significantly larger than MFSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FESM follows a index enhanced strategy; MFSV uses active selection.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FESM | MFSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.0B | $443M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.9% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.05% | 10.31% |
| Max drawdown | -26.93% | -12.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FESM and MFSV
Explore further