Screener
FESM vs OEF
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.08% less per year.
- OEF is significantly larger than FESM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FESM follows a index enhanced strategy; OEF uses index tracking.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FESM | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.0B | $19.6B |
| Since | 2007 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.9% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.05% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -26.93% | -31.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FESM and OEF
Explore further