Screener
FESM vs PTL
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF vs Inspire 500 ETF
Key differences
- PTL costs 0.19% less per year.
- FESM is significantly larger than PTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FESM follows a index enhanced strategy; PTL uses index tracking.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FESM | PTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.0B | $799M |
| Since | 2007 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.9% | +32.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.05% | 14.69% |
| Max drawdown | -26.93% | -19.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FESM and PTL
Explore further