Screener
FESM vs TMFC
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF vs Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- FESM costs 0.22% less per year.
- FESM follows a index enhanced strategy; TMFC uses index tracking.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FESM | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.0B | $2.0B |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.9% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.05% | 13.72% |
| Max drawdown | -26.93% | -33.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FESM and TMFC
Explore further