Screener
FEX vs AFSM
First Trust Large Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- FEX costs 0.18% less per year.
- FEX is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FEX follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FEX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FEX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FEX | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $94M |
| Since | 2007 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.6% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.1% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.57% | 17.84% |
| Max drawdown | -39.51% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FEX and AFSM
Explore further