Screener
FFEB vs BUFG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February vs FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF
Key differences
- FFEB costs 0.28% less per year.
- FFEB is significantly larger than BUFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FFEB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFEB | BUFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 1.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $303M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.9% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.24% | 7.76% |
| Max drawdown | -22.81% | -17.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFEB and BUFG
Explore further