Screener
FFEM vs RNEM
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M vs First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
Key differences
- FFEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- RNEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFEM | RNEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $17M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.16% | 13.35% |
| Max drawdown | -16.29% | -38.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFEM and RNEM
Explore further