Screener
FFEM vs XNAV
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- FFEM costs 0.67% less per year.
- FFEM is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FFEM follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFEM | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.32% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.6% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.43% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -16.29% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFEM and XNAV
Explore further