Screener
FFF vs BFOR
Founders 100 ETF vs Barron's 400 ETF
Key differences
- BFOR costs 0.10% less per year.
- BFOR is significantly larger than FFF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFF follows a active selection strategy; BFOR uses index tracking.
- BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFF | BFOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $211M |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.92% |
| Max drawdown | -21.89% | -41.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFF and BFOR
Explore further