Screener
FFF vs RFFC
Founders 100 ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.27% less per year.
- RFFC is significantly larger than FFF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFF | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $29M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -21.89% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFF and RFFC
Explore further