Screener
FFGX vs FDEM
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF vs Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FDEM costs 0.30% less per year.
- FDEM is significantly larger than FFGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FDEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFGX | FDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $40M | $508M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 2.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.2% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.66% | 16.92% |
| Max drawdown | -14.79% | -33.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFGX and FDEM
Explore further