Screener
FFLS vs EPSV
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while EPSV is an equity ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and EPSV 0.88%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while EPSV is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; EPSV uses index tracking.
- EPSV costs 0.72% less per year.
- FFLS is much larger than EPSV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $5M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +44.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 17.83% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -8.93% |
Similar to FFLS and EPSV
Explore further