Screener
FFLS vs GTO
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while GTO is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and GTO 0.35%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while GTO is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; GTO uses active selection.
- GTO costs 1.25% less per year.
- GTO is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | GTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 3.43% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -20.75% |
Similar to FFLS and GTO
Explore further