Screener
FFLS vs IMTB
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
FFLS is an alternative ETF, while IMTB is a fixed income ETF. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and IMTB 0.06%.
- FFLS is an alternative fund, while IMTB is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; IMTB uses index tracking.
- IMTB costs 1.54% less per year.
- IMTB is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $280M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.8% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.22% | 4.05% |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -18.15% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.