Screener
FFLS vs MATE
The Future Fund Long/Short ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
Both FFLS and MATE are alternative ETFs. FFLS charges 1.60% a year and MATE 0.97%. The main difference: FFLS follows a long short strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- FFLS follows a long short strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- FFLS covers North America; MATE covers emerging markets.
- MATE costs 0.63% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLS | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.60% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $39M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | long short | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.33% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.05% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.