Screener
FFLV vs EPMV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap vs Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FFLV costs 0.50% less per year.
- FFLV is significantly larger than EPMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFLV covers global markets; EPMV covers north america.
- FFLV follows a active selection strategy; EPMV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLV | EPMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $4M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.50% | 15.32% |
| Max drawdown | -16.71% | -8.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLV and EPMV
Explore further