Screener
FFLV vs REVS
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- REVS costs 0.19% less per year.
- REVS is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFLV covers global markets; REVS covers north america.
- FFLV follows a active selection strategy; REVS uses index tracking.
- REVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFLV | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $284M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.50% | 11.62% |
| Max drawdown | -16.71% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFLV and REVS
Explore further