Screener
FFND vs IEFA
One Global ETF vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.93% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; IEFA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IEFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $180.7B |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -34.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and IEFA
Explore further