Screener
FFND vs INTL
One Global ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.16% less per year.
- FFND is classified as equity, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; INTL uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $222M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.7% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 15.26% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFND and INTL
Explore further