Screener
FFND vs OSEA
One Global ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- OSEA costs 0.45% less per year.
- OSEA is significantly larger than FFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFND follows a active selection strategy; OSEA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFND | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $497M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.6% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.97% | 15.20% |
| Max drawdown | -47.84% | -18.14% |
Similar to FFND and OSEA
Explore further