Screener
FFSM vs BBHL
Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF vs BBH Select Large Cap ETF
Key differences
- FFSM follows a active selection strategy; BBHL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFSM | BBHL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.71% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $514M |
| Since | — | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.65% | -11.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFSM and BBHL
Explore further