Screener
FFSM vs EPSV
Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FFSM follows a active selection strategy; EPSV uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFSM | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $5M |
| Since | — | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -26.65% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFSM and EPSV
Explore further