Screener
FFTY vs CHAT
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
Key differences
- CHAT costs 0.05% less per year.
- CHAT is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FFTY follows a index tracking strategy; CHAT uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | CHAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2015 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 2.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +132.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +55.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.09% | 30.53% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and CHAT
Explore further