Screener
FFTY vs IGM
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGM costs 0.41% less per year.
- IGM is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IGM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $9.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.1% | +55.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +39.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.00% | 20.24% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -40.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and IGM
Explore further