Screener
FFTY vs TCHP
CapForce IBD 50 ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- TCHP costs 0.23% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TCHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FFTY | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $88M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.1% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.00% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -59.46% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FFTY and TCHP
Explore further