Screener
FHLC vs FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Key differences
- FHLC is significantly larger than FMAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FHLC | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $603M |
| Since | 2013 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.22% | 17.76% |
| Max drawdown | -28.76% | -41.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FHLC and FMAT
Explore further