Screener
FHLC vs TMED
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF vs T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF
Key differences
- FHLC costs 0.36% less per year.
- FHLC is significantly larger than TMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FHLC covers north america markets; TMED covers global.
- FHLC follows a index tracking strategy; TMED uses active selection.
- FHLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FHLC | TMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $19M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.44% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.22% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.76% | -11.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FHLC and TMED
Explore further