Screener
FICS vs IDHQ
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF
Key differences
Both FICS and IDHQ are equity ETFs. FICS charges 0.70% a year and IDHQ 0.29%. The main difference: IDHQ costs 0.41% less per year.
- IDHQ costs 0.41% less per year.
- IDHQ is much larger than FICS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IDHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IDHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | IDHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $811M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.44% | 20.20% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -33.87% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.