Screener
FICS vs IWB
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
Both FICS and IWB are equity ETFs. FICS charges 0.70% a year and IWB 0.15%. The main difference: FICS covers global markets excluding the US; IWB covers North America.
- FICS covers global markets excluding the US; IWB covers North America.
- IWB costs 0.55% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than FICS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2020 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.44% | 12.39% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -34.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.