Screener
FICS vs YMAR
First Trust International Developed Cap Strength ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- FICS costs 0.20% less per year.
- FICS is classified as equity, while YMAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FICS follows a index tracking strategy; YMAR uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| FICS | YMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $223M | $135M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.94% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.2% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.22% | 7.00% |
| Max drawdown | -29.16% | -22.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FICS and YMAR
Explore further