Screener
FID vs IDVZ
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- FID costs 0.15% less per year.
- FID follows a index tracking strategy; IDVZ uses active selection.
- FID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FID | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $161M | $155M |
| Since | 2013 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.09% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.8% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.17% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -39.79% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FID and IDVZ
Explore further