Screener
FIGB vs BINC
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- BINC is significantly larger than FIGB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FIGB follows a index tracking strategy; BINC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIGB | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $465M | $16.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.13% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.2% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.53% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -18.08% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIGB and BINC
Explore further