Screener
FISR vs MYCH
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs State Street My2028 Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- MYCH costs 0.35% less per year.
- FISR follows a index tracking strategy; MYCH uses active selection.
- FISR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | MYCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $418M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 4.45% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 1.63% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -1.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and MYCH
Explore further