Screener
FISR vs SPTI
State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SPTI costs 0.47% less per year.
- SPTI is significantly larger than FISR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPTI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FISR | SPTI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $514M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.11% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.7% | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.06 | -0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.41% | 3.44% |
| Max drawdown | -20.27% | -16.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FISR and SPTI
Explore further