Screener
FIVA vs FAB
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.48% less per year.
- FIVA is significantly larger than FAB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FIVA covers global markets; FAB covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, FIVA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIVA | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $533M | $139M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.7% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -39.60% | -47.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIVA and FAB
Explore further