Screener
FIVA vs QFRD
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF
Key differences
- FIVA costs 0.31% less per year.
- FIVA is significantly larger than QFRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FIVA covers global markets; QFRD covers north america.
- FIVA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIVA | QFRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $533M | $1M |
| Since | 2018 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.63% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.60% | -9.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIVA and QFRD
Explore further