Screener
FIW vs FAD
First Trust Water ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FIW costs 0.13% less per year.
- FIW is significantly larger than FAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FIW | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $480M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.3% | +37.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.34 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.70% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -36.60% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FIW and FAD
Explore further