Skip to content
Screener

FJUL vs FAPR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April

FJUL

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$1.2B

FAPR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April

Annual cost

0.85%

Fund size

$1.1B

Key differences

Both FJUL and FAPR are alternative ETFs. FJUL charges 0.85% a year and FAPR 0.85%. The main difference: Over the last three years, FJUL has delivered higher annualized returns.

  • Over the last three years, FJUL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

FJULFAPR
Annual cost (TER)0.85%0.85%
Fund size (AUM)$1.2B$1.1B
Since20202021
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategystructured outcomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+17.5%+11.3%
CAGR 3Y+16.5%+13.2%
CAGR 5Y+11.4%+8.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.251.05
Volatility 1Y7.05%4.19%
Max drawdown-13.08%-15.96%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all low-risk funds

Similar to FJUL and FAPR