Screener
FLCH vs FLJP
Franklin FTSE China ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLJP costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLJP is significantly larger than FLCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLCH covers emerging markets markets; FLJP covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, FLJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLCH | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $282M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.47% | 4.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +33.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.2% | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.12% | 19.13% |
| Max drawdown | -62.09% | -32.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLCH and FLJP
Explore further