Screener
FLIA vs MAGG
Franklin International Aggregate Bond ETF vs Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both FLIA and MAGG are fixed income ETFs. FLIA charges 0.25% a year and MAGG 0.36%. The main difference: FLIA follows a index tracking strategy; MAGG uses active selection.
- FLIA follows a index tracking strategy; MAGG uses active selection.
- FLIA covers global markets excluding the US; MAGG covers North America.
- FLIA costs 0.11% less per year.
- FLIA is much larger than MAGG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLIA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLIA | MAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $750M | $68M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 4.73% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.0% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.33% | 3.95% |
| Max drawdown | -11.24% | -4.55% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.